TelOne (Pvt) Ltd v Chigaazira (SC70/17)

Indeed the use of the word “and” between sections 12(B)(3)(B)(i) and (ii) shows that both sub-sections must be interpreted jointly and not separately. It was going to be a different case if the legislature had used a word such as “or” which would give a claimant an option to prove legitimate expectation alone without worrying about wether someone was employed in their stead.

This content is for Free Membership members only.
Login Join Now

Indeed the use of the word “and” between sections 12(B)(3)(B)(i) and (ii) shows that both sub-sections must be interpreted jointly and not separately. It was going to be a different case if the legislature had used a word such as “or” which would give a claimant an option to prove legitimate expectation alone without worrying about wether someone was employed in their stead.

This content is for Free Membership members only.
Login Join Now
error: Content is protected !!